Need help implementing this on your team?
We'll install the skills, customize them to your workflow, and run the output through your team's combined LinkedIn network. Skills do the research, Linkd does the motion.
Feed in an account list + an ICP. The skill returns A/B/C tiers with the reasoning behind each row. Differentiation is forced, if 80% of accounts score B, the tiering didn't do its job. Accounts without enough data get flagged "unscored", not guessed.
Tiering is only useful if the user can act on it. The skill avoids three failures: fake precision (a "97/100 fit score" on partial firmographics), identical scores across the list (if 80% land in B-tier the tiering didn't work), and scoring on dimensions the ICP doesn't actually care about.
The ICP gets translated into weighted scoreable dimensions, industries, headcount range, geographies, technographics, triggers, with weights from either the user or sensible ICP defaults. Each account gets scored across them, with the reasoning per row.
When account data is too thin to score reliably, the row gets flagged "unscored" with a note on what's missing. The user can fill the gap or accept the flag. Either way, no confidence-laundered guesses.
Translate the ICP into weighted scoreable dimensions. Industries get weight, headcount gets weight, technographics get weight. User can override weights.
For accounts with partial firmographics, attempt enrichment via web_search. Flag what couldn't be found rather than guessing.
Compute a fit score per account. Force differentiation, if too many rows land in B-tier, the skill re-thresholds rather than producing an unhelpful flat list.
A (work first), B (work after A), C (deprioritize), Unscored (insufficient data, surface to user).
Each row: tier, score, top contributing dimensions, missing dimensions. The user can audit every assignment.
"97/100 fit" on partial data is confidence-laundering. The skill produces score bands (A/B/C) with reasoning, not false-precision numerics.
If 80% of accounts land in B-tier, the tiering failed. The skill re-thresholds to ensure A and C have meaningful population.
Accounts without enough data don't get guessed into a tier. They're flagged "unscored" with a note on what's missing.
Top contributing dimensions shown per row. The user can spot-check assignments and trust (or correct) the result.
Each row carries its tier, its fit score, the top 2–3 contributing dimensions, and any missing data. Plus a summary block showing tier distribution and which ICP dimensions had the most differentiating power.
The download is a zip containing two things: the .skill file (what you upload to Claude) and a SKILL.md sidecar (the human-readable instructions). Unzip first, then follow the steps for your Claude.
.skill file from the unzipped bundle..skill file too (it's also a zip).~/.claude/skills/web_search and file output enabled.This is exactly what Claude reads when the skill triggers. No hidden prompts, no separate config. What you see here is what you get.
We'll install the skills, customize them to your workflow, and run the output through your team's combined LinkedIn network. Skills do the research, Linkd does the motion.